few days ago the President met with government and business enterprises in the country. More important from the point of view of the current account that treasure their leaders, we should not forget that among all these companies account for a third of gross national product, so that the other two thirds are SMEs so that, they themselves are the Spain's most important, not only regarding the amount of economy that generate, but in terms of jobs created (and destroyed) and the most affected by the crisis, no doubt.
Of all these potentates who earn in one month what you and me in a century, there were voices like that of Emilio Botin, telling the president that he should not prolong his succession debate and that no early elections.
We certainly marked a red line that should not happen, and President, obedient as ever, and submissive as ever, not even a week has been slow in giving their verdict in accordance with instructions received.
not be submitted to the elections as a candidate and will not advance the electoral calendar. End of debate.
I think it's very healthy and hygienic from the democratic point of view that presidents are not more than two terms. This measure is so practical that is covered by the U.S. Constitution where presidents, like it or not want the citizens, can not be more than eight years in a row.
It would be nice for a similar measure here, the problem is not the change of president, but the change of party in power.
did miss us then?
What comes next both argue?
Is not that the essence of democracy?
Or is that what really bothers us is that the red line marking the shoulder straps of Mr Botin?
0 comments:
Post a Comment