Multiplication Table Chart

Sex Contest Tweets


As Alejandro Jodorowsky said: "For me, literature twits are now quick, deep, free, ephemeral, collective, a wonderful spiritual adventure, pure poetry.
enough to copyright.'s Poetry is an office, is only pleasure. At last we can do in a free art twitter. Death to the dollar! " @ Alejodorowsky

Expanding on this idea, I have a few weeks mulling over the possibility of a boost from this blog Tweets contest erotic content.

This occurred to me these ideas but I need feedback from twiteros (and blog readers in general) to finish Profiling:



1 º) is a contest where you can join any tweet whenever you have an erotic content. Naturally we will try to give a character the most literary, poetic, sensual, suggestive, metaphorical or anything that can fit in 140 characters. Naturally tweets worth OOOOOOHHHHH type, AAAAHHHH, but they have none of this so please estrujaos meninges.

2 º) to the competition must always send the tweet with # mber hastag (microblogging erotic)

3 º) score of the best tweets will be given by the number of retweets with the tweets in question, so the winner will be the tweet tweeted, so it will be the winner by popular acclaim.

4 th) The competition will start and end time to participate.

5 º) There will be a particular prize, just the pleasure of knowing winner. (Unless we find someone to sponsor)

with these simple rules, I need some feed back to throw. I hope your comments in the coming days.

A hug for everyone s

Captain Morgan Best With

The Oracle of Google

In the not too distant, those who wanted to anticipate the future recourse to methods all esoteric with the hope of knowing what they could expect just around the corner. Today
television at night time are filled with televangelists Cartomante we predict our good news to change phones plucked on these special pricing.

However we have an oracle is free and is seldom wrong because it works with "Algorithms." If small never learned what a logarithm - much less to its famous cousin, the Napier-is because the logarithms and algorithms have some magic. Should be something like more infallible than the Pope.

To which we. After the last "crisis" Government (why not call them crisis, but I think it is because Zapatero, the crisis which translates into Chinese the word crisis is composed of two ideograms that mean danger and opportunity, say those who know Chinese). After the last crisis, I say, have triggered speculation about who might be the socialist candidate for the 2012 general elections.
In this sense, brainy analysts pursued until the last clue to succeed in a pool where the google search engine and shows us who are clear candidates and those who are not.

If you put in google the keys to see if certain Web domains are reserved or getting any information at first hand
www.zapatero2012.com For example the domain is obviously reserved (how could it be otherwise). Lo and behold, there are others who are:
www.rubalcaba2012.com is busy (not for how long but it is)
www.carmechachon2012.com is too. However
Pepebono2012 Pepeblanco2012 or not. Are
clear and Ferraz triplet? Google if you have it clear.

And in Genoa? As the Popular Party lost no time Marinorajoy2012.com
course is reserved.
Esperanzaaguirre2012.es is reserved (but this lady was not going to submit to the Chair of the Community Autonomous Region of Madrid in 2011?)
And just in case, Rodrigorato2012.com is also reserved. Neither Ruiz Gallardón

nor Saenz de Santamaria, neither De Cospedal have nothing with his name that ends in 2012.
So we also know from those who bet google for how popular they entertain.
I am sure that around a few years, the whole issue of the primaries or political candidates nominated by the parties, will in popular votes through the Internet course. In fact the vote also will be this way. One can only solve some problems arising from security in the vote and the inability to vote massively manipulated, which as an electronic ID will in place, sure it is resolved.
By the way, Google has already made his bet "bet with him?